



|
 |
 |

Below are case studies of a few of our successful, timely, and cost-effective solutions. Click on a client name or service area to find a specific case
study, or just scroll down.
 |

|

|
Association of American Railroads (AAR)
Detailed case study

|
 |
Working with a team of legal and technical experts and client staff, CEA helped establish consensus among state and federal regulators to develop
one comprehensive nationwide regulatory structure for regulating locomotive emissions. Our clients avoided regulations that would have imposed costs of $4-6 billion.

|
 |


|

|
Auto Manufacturer

|
 |
On behalf of an automotive manufacturer, CEA performed analysis and developed recommendations for compliance with zero emission vehicle (ZEV) regulations.
CEA helped to revise the baseline design for applicable zero emission programs by including a process to provide incentives for placing advanced technology vehicles in California.
This involved helping to craft future regulations, developing short- and long-term implementation strategies, and defining a stakeholder engagement process to build support
for California?s recommended approach.

|
 |


|

|
Auto Manufacturer

|
 |
On behalf of an automotive manufacturer, CEA participated in crafting an implementation framework for future alternative fuels. A range of scenarios
was evaluated for future fuels including hydrogen, low sulfur diesel, Fischer Tropsch fuels and natural gas. Economic, policy, and technical variables were considered.

|
 |


|

|
Burger King Corporation
Detailed case study

|
 |
CEA effectively negotiated with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to suspend costly violations issued to Burger King while
the search for cost-effective and efficient control equipment was being conducted. Issuance of Notices of Violation was stopped and the SCAQMD agreed to a two-year implementation
period to provide our client with an opportunity to secure financing and install control equipment on its buildings.

|
 |


|

|
Glass Manufacturer
Detailed case study

|
 |
A large California glass manufacturer was interested in developing and executing an emissions reduction credit trading strategy that would protect
their current manufacturing operations while stabilizing or increasing revenue through various air emission credit trading strategies. CEA developed a strategy to trade millions
of pounds of credits and to successfully protect the value of the client?s air pollution emissions credit assets at a facility slated for shutdown.

|
 |


|

|
Glass Packaging Institute (GPI)

Detailed case study
|
 |
CEA worked with regulators on behalf of an industry association to establish a technically feasible and affordable level of nitrogen oxide control.
Under CEA?s recommended program, emissions were reduced by 75% at only 20% of the cost of the original rule.

|
 |


|

|
Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc.

|
 |
On behalf of one of the nation?s largest building management companies, CEA conducted indoor air quality assessments for multi-story buildings at
multiple sites. Assessments were based on standardized EPA/NIOSH evaluation protocols. Methodologies included air quality sampling and testing for chemical/microbiological
agents, HVAC system integrity, exposure pathway mapping, and an evaluation of individual employee symptoms. Recommendations were made to ameliorate existing exposure burdens
and to optimize the efficiency of HVAC systems.

|
 |

|
| |
Southern Pacific Transportation Company
Southern California
Detailed case study
|
|
Southern Pacific was interested in developing a strategy to decrease dramatically the likelihood of locomotives operating in potential violation
of local visible emission standards. CEA worked with Southern Pacific and SCAQMD regulators to develop a strategy that would significantly reduce, if not eliminate, future
violations. Through CEA’S leadership, Southern Pacific was successful in establishing a voluntary compliance program with the SCAQMD, thereby avoiding litigation and
costly fines.
|
|

|

|
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Los Angeles, CA
Detailed case study

|
 |
CEA worked with UCLA to conceptualize and sell a retrofit rule for industrial cogeneration facilities in Southern California. The rule achieved
90% of the desired NOx reduction at 20% of the cost of original regulatory proposal, resulting in a savings of over $35 million in capital costs for our client.

|
 |


|
|
|

|
Infrastructure Manufacturer

|
 |
CEA assisted in the development of distributed generation business plans for a major manufacturing company. Analysis included an evaluation of the
environmental attributes of distributed generation technology, opportunities to develop next generation regulations, and the integration of auto and energy sector infrastructure.

|
 |


|
|
|

|
Station/Shared Car Program

|
 |
In collaboration with state agencies, universities, and a major auto manufacturer, CEA is currently supporting the growth of station/shared car programs
in the state of California. This involves developing a regulatory framework, technological infrastructure, and short and long-term business plans for station/shared car programs.
The programs are defined to include the use of next generation vehicles, advanced communication systems, and customer optimized vehicle access/management systems.

|
 |


|

|
University of California, Berkeley

|
 |
CEA participated in a hydrogen strategy project with UC Berkeley, UC Davis, and Humboldt State University that analyzed and recommended the role
of hydrogen in California?s future transportation and energy sectors.
Timothy Lipman, Daniel M. Kammen, Joan Ogden, Daniel Sperling, et al. (July 9, 2004). " An
Integrated Hydrogen Vision for California."

|
 |
| |


|
|

|
Chemical Strategies Partnership
San Francisco, CA

|
 |
CEA serves as the management team for the Chemical Strategies Partnership (CSP)
and its membership arm, the CMS Forum. CSP was founded in 1996 and seeks to reduce chemical use, waste, risks, and cost through the transformation of the chemical supply chain
by redefining the way chemicals are used and sold. CSP promotes as service-based model, called ?chemical management services? where manufacturers shift away from a traditional
supplier relationship to a strategic alliance with a chemical service provider. Instead of purchasing chemicals, the manufacturer purchases chemical services: assistance in
purchasing, managing, and tracking chemicals. This shift to chemical services directly aligns the incentives of the service provider and manufacturer to reduce chemical use
and costs. CSP has collaborated with more than 10 companies to assist them in analyzing current chemical management costs and designing a chemical management services (CMS)
program. CSP also serves as an information clearinghouse, disseminating the model and introducing CMS to new industry sectors.

|
 |

|

|
CMS Forum

San Francisco, CA |
 |
CEA serves as the coordinator of the Chemical Management Services Forum (CMS Forum) a coalition
of CMS providers, their customers, tier II chemical suppliers, and other stakeholders interested in promoting CMS. The mission of the CMS Forum is to grow the awareness and
practice of economically and environmentally beneficial chemical management services. CEA conducts workshops, educational outreach, industry research, and promotional activities
for the CMS Forum.

|
 |

|

|
Infrastructure Manufacturer

|
 |
CEA assisted in the development of distributed generation business plans for a major manufacturing company. Analysis included an evaluation of the
environmental attributes of distributed generation technology, opportunities to develop next generation regulations, and the integration of auto and energy sector infrastructure.

|
 |

|
| |
Trust for Conservation Innovation
San Francisco, CA
Detailed case study
|
|
In 2001, several non-profit projects approached CEA to help develop an efficient and highly client-driven non-profit organization that could serve
as a fiscal sponsor. After conducting research on fiscal sponsors in the US, CEA helped establish a new non-profit organization to support environmental leaders in their
conservation work: The Trust for Conservation Innovation. CEA provides The Trust with the staff
required to execute its administrative tasks.
|
|

|
| |
World Wildlife Fund International
San Francisco, CA
Detailed case study
|
|
CEA developed a business plan for WWF's initiative to implement the European Union's reformed fisheries legislation, the Common Fisheries Policy.
This work involved the evaluation of WWF's current policy, advocacy, and research capacity throughout its network of national organizations in Europe. In addition, CEA evaluated
the capacity of potential partners including other non-governmental organizations and research institutions. The final business plan outlined WWF's initiative strategy, organizational
structure, and financial budget. The plan was designed to leverage WWF's current network capacity, as well as opportunities for collaboration with other organizations.
|
|

|

|

|
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
New York, New York
Detailed case study

|
 |
On behalf of the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, CEA evaluated the opportunities for a new programmatic investment to support the use of incentive-based
tools for biodiversity conservation in the United States. In designing the program, CEA investigated past and current incentive models, barriers to success, prospects for
national scalability, and financial leverage opportunities. CEA assisted the Foundation in evaluating potential grantees for the program. The project resulted in the investment
of $10 million over five years to establish the Center for Conservation Incentives.

|
 |

|

|
Funders for Sustainable Food Systems
San Francisco, CA
Detailed case study

|
 |
The Funders for Sustainable Food Systems (FSFS) is a California-based group of public and
private grantmakers whose mission is to promote a sustainable agriculture and food system in California. CEA serves as Coordinator for FSFS, providing staff capacity to organize
and strategically lead their process forward.

|
 |

|

|
North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC)
Detailed case study

|
 |
CEA worked on behalf of the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign (NAPPC) with support
from the Turner Foundation to identify strategic opportunities for pollinator protection in North America. The resulting report, Funding Opportunities for Pollinator Protection
in North America, underscores the critical importance of pollinators and provides strategic approaches for organizations dedicated to pollinator protection as well as providing
current and potential funders with funding opportunities for pollinator protection.

|
 |

|

|
Oak Foundation
Detailed case study

|
 |
CEA evaluated the Oak Foundation's marine grant portfolio. This included an evaluation of over 55 grants, spanning much of the globe and ranging
from support for marine protected areas in Belize to fisheries reform in the Bering Strait and policy reform in Brussels. The evaluation included in-depth case studies of
several grantees, including an analysis of their accomplishments to date, collaboration with other partners, and potential leverage of other projects in their region. The
project culminated in recommendations on how the Foundation could further concentrate their grantmaking both geographically and topically to be more effective in achieving
its desired results.

|
 |

|

|
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Los Altos, California
Detailed case study

|
 |
On behalf of a number of philanthropic foundations including the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, CEA evaluated the performance of organizations
involved in environmental certification programs and analyzed improvements that could be made. This work primarily addressed the effectiveness of current certification methods
in changing market behaviors and market strategies to remove existing barriers. The models resulting from this analysis were used as a basis for a funders' meeting to develop
future strategies for managing their related grant investments.

|
 |

|

|
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Los Altos, California

|
 |
On behalf of The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, CEA has evaluated potential Program Related Investments (PRIs) for the purpose of furthering
sustainable fisheries. CEA performed detailed due diligence on a number of potential investments, which included analyzing company performance against financial and environmental
criteria. Most recently, CEA has structured a $20 million private equity fund to invest in companies that further access to sustainable seafood. The Sea
Change Investment Fund is capitalized with a $10 million PRI loan from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, matched by a $10 million private equity investment and
will invest in seafood companies which meet strict sustainability and financial criteria. The Fund's dual objectives are to expand the market for sustainable seafood and demonstrate
that sustainable seafood is profitable for the fisherman and for the investor.

|
 |

|

|
The Pew Charitable Trusts
Philadelphia, PA
Detailed case study

|
 |
The Pew Charitable Trusts, a leading national philanthropic foundation, was seeking to develop a market-based program to encourage U.S. manufacturers
to reduce their use and release of persistent toxic chemicals. CEA worked with the Tellus Institute to design a national
program to promote chemical use reduction as a long-term business strategy. This assignment led to the creation of the Chemical
Strategies Partnership.

|
 |

|

|
Resources Legacy Fund

|
 |
On behalf of the Resources Legacy Fund, CEA designed a grantee selection structure for the Sustainable Fisheries Fund, a fund administered to support
fisheries pursuing Marine Stewardship Council certification. This work involved the analysis of funding objectives and opportunities for the Sustainable Fisheries Fund to
increase the efficacy of the Marine Stewardship Council. CEA also developed practical investment criteria for the fund such as scalability, certifiability, and stakeholder
support for potential grantees.

|
 |

|

|
Roots of Change Fund
San Francisco, CA
Detailed case study

|
 |
CEA worked with a team of funders to conceptualize and develop the Roots of Change (ROC) Fund.
The ROC Fund is a funder collaborative supporting work to accelerate California?s transition to more sustainable food systems. The ROC Fund, working with an outside advisory
board of experts ? the Roots of Change (ROC) Council ? supports key projects that will help California lead the way to food systems that protect public health, sustain natural
resources and biodiversity, provide sustainable livelihoods for farmers and farm laborers, and support thriving regional food economies. CEA currently serves as the project
director for the ROC Fund and coordinates grantmaking activities, project convenings, and ongoing administration.

|
 |

|

|
Women's Environmental Leadership Legacy Network

|
 |
CEA provides strategic support for the organizational development and ongoing activities of the Women's
Environmental Leadership (WELL) Network, which is a non-profit, nonpartisan leadership organization uniting women throughout California to ensure the environmental health
and well-being of families and communities.

|
 |

|

|